Balance - New England

A blog devoted, in part, to pointing out pieces of truth, injustice and those little-known stories that don't necessarily make the headlines, but demand our attention nevertheless.

Saturday, May 22, 2004

"Bush Is Incompetent" -Rep. Nancy Pelosi



You go, girl!

FINALLY...the liberal counter-attack machine is taking shape! While Howard Dean may have planted the seeds, various members of the liberal and progressive communities are growing our message to counter what has long been a conservative-controlled debate.

U.S. Representative and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco amplified the progressive sentiments regarding Bush by making the following observations:

"The emperor has no clothes. When are people going to face the reality? Pull this curtain back!"

"The situation in Iraq and the reckless economic policies in the United States speak to one issue for me, and that is the competence of our leader. These policies are not working. But speaking specifically to Iraq, we have a situation where -- without adequate evidence -- we put our young people in harm's way."

"I believe that the president's leadership in the actions taken in Iraq demonstrate an incompetence in terms of knowledge, judgment and experience in making the decisions that would have been necessary to truly accomplish the mission without the deaths to our troops and the cost to our taxpayers."

"Rocket-propelled grenades, not rose petals, greeted them. Instead...of Iraq being a country that would readily pay for its own reconstruction...we're up to over $200 billion in cost to the American people."

PELOSI DID NOT BACK DOWN, even when asked if her comments would undermine Bush's abilities as commander in chief: "His [Bush's] activities, his decisions, the results of his actions are what undermines his leadership, not my statement. My statements are just a statement of fact."

Click HERE to learn more about Rep. Pelosi.

Monday, May 17, 2004

Celebration in Cambridge

As the birthplace of the slavery abolition movement and a key constituency contributing to equal rights for women during a time when, by law, they were subservient to men who were--again, by law--"head and master" of households with unilateral control of property owned jointly, the great Commonwealth of Massachusetts is yet again paving the way for the civil rights of another group of people: gay and lesbian people.

I can assure you, everything is the same as it always has been here--nothing has changed. The sun still rose above the horizon...people still grumbled as they got out of bed to go to work on a Monday morning...the phones still ring...the dishes are still waiting to be put in the dishwasher...the drivers are still notoriously rude...the subway trains are still running...the Red Sox are still scheduled to play in Tampa Bay tomorrow...and the residents of Massachusetts will still turn in this evening for a night's rest.

It was a totally normal yet historic day in the state I call home.

The following are scenes from this morning's early hours here in Cambridge, which was the first city in the United States to legally accept civil (NOT religious) marriage applications from same-sex couples:



Above: Cambridge City Hall lawn, Central Square - Sunday evening, May 16, 2004



Above: Cambridge City Council Chambers



Above: Some of the very first applicants for a civil marriage license in Cambridge City Hall

Thursday, May 13, 2004

Gap Inc. Admits To Sweatshops

By admitting they haven't done enough to ensure humane working conditions and wages at the factories around the world that make their clothes, Gap Inc. has turned a lot of heads and ears its way.

Gap has also compiled, for the first time, a 2003 Social Responsibility Report detailing how it will work to improve the lives of the people who make their clothing. Click HERE to download and read the report (Adobe Acrobat Reader required).

Gap is moving in the same direction more and more companies are: that is, AWAY from the asinine theory that doing whatever it takes to make a buck is more important than taking care of your employees and customers.

As Gap's CEO states, "We feel strongly that commerce and social responsibility don’t have to be at odds." In fact, a company that practices social responsibility and ensures its employees are happy will see much higher productivity and profits than those that don't.

This requires a company to see a bigger picture that is difficult to create in today's intense environment of meeting quarterly short-term goals. The Gen-X founders of Google.com so eloquently said that running your company on the basis of quarterly short-term goals demanded by the stock market is like someone who is trying to lose weight stepping on a scale every half-hour--it just doesn't work! Long-term goals including taking care of employees and customers is what delivers big returns for everyone, including stockholders.

It's time more American companies realize that GREED IS COUNTERPRODUCTIVE and understand the value of happy employees. They should take a lesson from Gap, Costco, Ben & Jerry's, or any of the other companies making social responsibility a priority--it's the future of American business.



Here's an article from this morning's Boston Metro newspaper:

IN AN UNUSUAL display of corporate candor, Gap Inc. acknowledged that many of the overseas workers making the retailer’s clothes are mistreated and vowed to improve often shoddy factory conditions by cracking down on unrepentant manufacturers.

The San Francisco-based owner of the Gap, Old Navy and Banana Republic stores made the comments yesterday in its first ever “social responsibility” report — a 40-page document.

“We feel strongly that commerce and social responsibility don’t have to be at odds,” Gap CEO Paul Pressler told a small gathering of shareholders yesterday at the company’s annual meeting.

Gap is uncovering thousands of violations at 3,009 factories scattered across roughly 50 countries. “Few factories, if any, are in full compliance all of the time,” the report said.

Workplace activists who have long chided Gap for making its clothes at so-called “sweatshops” praised the merchant for shedding light on rampant abuses that have been haunting the clothing industry for years. AP

Friday, May 07, 2004

New Movie: "Super Size Me"

"Last year, Morgan Spurlock decided to eat all his meals at McDonald's for a month. For 30 straight days, everything he took in—breakfast, lunch, dinner, even his bottled water—came from McDonald's. Spurlock recorded the results on camera for his film Super Size Me, which won the Best Director prize for documentaries at this year's Sundance Film Festival.

Super Size Me is also a kind of shock/horror movie, as viewers see the 33-year-old Spurlock's physical condition collapse, day by day. "My body just basically falls apart over the course of this diet," Spurlock told Newsweek. "I start to get tired, I start to get headaches; my liver basically starts to fill up with fat because there's so much fat and sugar in this food. My blood sugar skyrockets, my cholesterol goes up off the charts, my blood pressure becomes completely unmanageable. The doctors were like, 'You have to stop.'" In one month on the fast-food regime, he gained 25 pounds." - excerpt from Craig Lambert's article in Harvard Magazine



Click HERE to go to the movie's website to learn more about it.

Click HERE to find out which movie theaters near you are playing "Super Size Me."

Tuesday, May 04, 2004

Invisible Legacies

There are histories that we, in the year 2004, don't fully comprehend. We are probably AWARE of the legacies of race in our country, but we fail to internalize them and acknowledge that these histories have lead to huge disparities between white people and people of color.

I think the article below best illustrates how this works. I wouldn't normally reprint the entire article on this blog, but I felt it too important not to include every single word.

Please take a few minutes to read the following short article and to contemplate it. Click HERE to go directly to the article on the Common Dreams website.

Climbing the White Escalator

by Betsy Leondar-Wright

"America is a meritocracy," my father always told me. The harder he worked, the more money he got: clear cause and effect. From individuals' prosperity or poverty, he believed he could determine their effort and talent. Therefore the poor black people in a nearby city clearly hadn't applied themselves.

My father had a legacy that he couldn't see, a legacy he only got because he is white. His ancestor, John Prescott, came from England in 1638. The Massachusetts Bay Colony granted him land in Central Massachusetts ­ something no people of color got -- and he built the first sawmill there. As far as I can tell, none of his descendants have ever been poor. Some of my ancestors moved west to Ohio in the 1800s, where they may have received land under one of the Homestead Acts ­government programs closed to people of color.

My father is a World War II-era veteran, and he went to graduate school on the GI Bill. Most veterans of color were unable to access these education benefits. The few black colleges were swamped with applicants, and most other colleges accepted white students only. Job training programs in the South were segregated and under local white control. African Americans were one-third of the WWII vets in the South but got one-twelfth of the job training slots.

My parents bought our first house with a Veterans Administration mortgage. The cheap subsidized mortgages of that era could not be used in mixed-race neighborhoods, or in inner cities. Because most banks issued only government-subsidized mortgages, most WWII veterans of color had to remain renters.

My father's parents got Social Security old-age benefits, which spared my father from supporting them. This enabled him to pay for our college educations. Social Security initially excluded domestic and agricultural workers, which meant that most people of color did not qualify in the first decades of the program. The minimum wage still excludes agricultural workers. The parents of today's middle-aged people of color typically had to support their own parents, and so couldn't save for college tuition as easily as my parents saved for mine.

Of course effort and talent make a difference in climbing the staircase to prosperity. But for most white men, the staircase has been an escalator powered by public assistance. I saw this in my own family. My father had a relative who was unambitious, sweet but slow-thinking. He got a middle-management job and stayed in it for decades, and lived in the same small house until he retired with a pension. He was carried gently up the escalator, ending up lower than my dad, who put a lot of effort into climbing and so reached upper management. That was the range for college-educated WASP men of their generation: middle-management and small homes, or high-level jobs and big homes. They started in the middle of the staircase and got help to rise. Working-class white men may have started at the bottom, but in that era they had opportunities and assistance to climb upward.

Historically, for people of color, the escalator has been broken. Sometimes they have had to hike up a fast-moving down escalator. No matter how hard they worked, they rarely got the same rewards as white people. Their wages were lower, and many neighborhoods and schools were closed to them. In some eras and places, laws and violence kept them off the staircase to prosperity entirely.

Civil rights legislation has allowed people of color to step onto the staircase. But there's no GI Bill today. The more recent government programs open to people of color, such as welfare and Food Stamps, have been tiny compared with the vast assets conferred on whites by the Homestead Acts and the GI Bill. And these recent programs have only helped with immediate living expenses, not college, home ownership, or other assets that provide security for coming generations. People of color have recently become homeowners in greater numbers thanks mostly to their own savings, without the kind of substantial government assistance that white families got in the 1950s and 1960s.

Government boosts for white people were invisible to my father. He opposed government hand-outs as destroying incentives to strive, without considering the hand-outs his family had received. In truth, prosperity comes from a mixture of individual effort and assistance from family and government. America won't be a meritocracy until the escalator rises at the same speed for everyone.

Betsy Leondar-Wright (bleondar-wright@faireconomy.org) is the Racial Wealth Divide communications director at United for a Fair Economy.